Benchmarking in healthcare offers a practical way of measuring and comparing services.
It can help improve performance, set standards of excellence and identify gaps in learning.
So how is it done?
What is Benchmarking?
Benchmarking is a powerful management tool that was originally developed to maintain high standards in industry.
Although a relatively new initiative for many healthcare organisations, benchmarks are now rapidly gaining recognition as a useful tool to help ‘shine a light’ on critical areas of nursing (Hospice UK 2017).
It’s the process of establishing a high standard of excellence by regularly comparing healthcare services with best practices from other institutions.
One of the great advantages of benchmarking is its adaptability to specific nursing specialities. From acute to long-term care, health promotion and self-care, through to pain management and pressure ulcers, benchmarking can be successfully applied to almost any clinical speciality.
Whilst it’s important to differentiate between ‘best practices benchmarking’ and ‘peer benchmarking’, Ettorchi-Tardy (2012) notes that a key characteristic of all benchmarking is that it’s part of a comprehensive and participative policy of continuous quality improvement.
According to the Royal College of Nursing (2014), benchmarking theory is built primarily on performance comparison and gap identification. Or to put it another way, it’s a form of quality assurance using active collaboration between organisations to create a spirit of competition and apply best practices.
Using benchmarks gives nursing teams a relatively easy way to identify practices where performance could be improved, or where new initiatives can be introduced to help raise standards of care.
Key to this is a willingness to share information and compare outcomes with other peer organisations.
Advantages of Benchmarking Include:
- Providing a systematic approach to the assessment of practice
- Promoting reflective practice
- Providing an avenue for change in clinical practice
- Ensuring pockets of innovative practice are not wasted
- Reducing repetition of effort and resources
- Reducing fragmentation and geographical variations in care
- Providing evidence for additional resources
Defining the Scope of Practice
One of the key benefits of benchmarking is that it can help overcome resistance to change by highlighting alternative ways of solving problems.
Learning from others and sharing knowledge of what has worked well during benchmarking can go a long way to making the task more manageable. To make the process easier many hospitals publish their own benchmarking guidelines.
For example, NHS Wales (2018) offers the following guidelines to help identify the scope of practice for a typical clinical benchmarking project.
- Regularly comparing functions or processes with best practice
- Identifying where performance could be improved
- Seeking fresh views and ideas to bring about improvements in performance
- Following up by implementing improvements
- Monitoring progress and reviewing the benefits
Teamwork is Essential
To work well, benchmarking needs to be a team process.
As part of the purpose of benchmarking is to raise standards, it’s likely that the outcomes may involve changes to current practices. This means that the effects of change could be felt throughout the entire clinical team and possibly extend throughout the department.
So, for benchmarking to be successful, it needs to be a team process with understanding and support for any potential changes that may lie ahead.
The willingness to share good practice is also essential. Without it benchmarking cannot even begin.
This is why benchmarking isn’t just an activity for managers. Nurses and Midwives at every level of seniority play a vital role in ensuring that their healthcare facility is a leader in meeting national benchmark standards.
Continuous Quality Improvement
In recent years, benchmarks have also developed into a valuable quality assurance tool that can easily be adapted for use in a wide variety of healthcare environments.
Many different benchmarking models exist. For example, Ettorchi-Tardy (2012) recommends a 9 step model, whilst the Royal College of Nursing (2014) expands this to a 12 step model.
Both share key similarities with other organisations and include the following steps:
- Select the service or activity to be improved
- Gather expert input and identify benchmarking partners
- Identify measurement factors
- Identify the competitive gap by comparing against benchmarks of best practice
- Design a scoring method and score current practice
- Set future performance targets
- Communicate the benchmarking results
- Develop action plans and implement changes
- Monitor progress, update and re-score.
All of these steps are built around the four core principles of benchmarking that are relevant to nursing (York 2015).
- Maintaining quality
- Improving customer satisfaction
- Improving patient safety
- Continuous improvement
Sower (2007) goes further by suggesting that benchmarking should not just involve comparing your hospital with national averages, it should also involve looking at best-in-class hospitals and finding out what they do, or even looking beyond the healthcare industry to learn from other service industries too.
Improving the quality and effectiveness of care is a key aim for all practitioners, regardless of clinical speciality, or size of the department, and sharing good practice is one of the best ways to achieve this.
Benefits of Shared Benchmarking Across Institutions and Across Countries
- Allows for a sharing of knowledge and experience
- Promotes contacts and networks
- Identifies gaps between current practice and ‘good practice’
- Brings an external focus to an internal review
- Improves decision-making through referencing comparative data
- Helps to demystify and encourage change
- Can lead to the identification of new ideas and innovative approaches
(University of Tasmania, 2018)
Whilst most benchmarking projects involve comparisons with other local or national institutions, some practitioners go further by seeking international comparisons.
Although this can add significantly to the workload, it can also broaden learning and lead to a greater sharing of good practice and further quality improvements.
The benefits of international comparisons are also strongly endorsed by Agarwal et al. (2016), who used benchmarking to explore the quality of management practices of public hospitals in the Australian healthcare system alongside seven other countries including the UK.
Eiff (2015) also endorses the benefits of international comparisons stating that hospitals worldwide are facing the same opportunities and threats.
The demographics of an ageing population, steady increases in chronic diseases together with severe illnesses and a steadily increasing demand for medical services, all pose universal healthcare challenges. Yet, Eiff also urges caution, suggesting that making comparisons without ‘looking behind the figures’ can limit the quality and reliability of findings.
Bevan (2018) takes this inherent desire to share good practice a step further suggesting that part of the motivation for benchmarking is the need to maintain a good reputation.
Drawing on research conducted in Italy and the UK it was shown that benchmarking can improve poor performance through naming and shaming and enhance good performance through competitive benchmarking and peer learning.
Benchmarking can be a valuable technique for quickly lifting the performance of an organisation.
It’s not only about auditing practice to ensure high clinical standards but it’s also a way of supporting open comparison and sharing information to allow continuous improvement and development (Kay 2007).
Without a doubt, nurses in all specialities are being challenged to adapt to the changing demands of healthcare.
With this comes the need to provide cost-effective, highly efficient, quality patient care and benchmarking is one of the tools that can be used to achieve this.
[show_more more=”Show References” less=”Hide References” align=”center” color=”#808080″]
- Agarwal, R, Green, R, Agarwal, N & Randhawa, K 2016, ‘Benchmarking management practices in Australian public healthcare’, Journal of Health Organisation and Management, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 31-56, viewed 24 April 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26964848
- Bevan, G 2018, ‘Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world’, Health Economics Policy and Law, viewed 24 April 2018, https://www.researchgate.net/…improving_health_care_across_the_world
- Eiff, W 2015 ‘International benchmarking and best practice management: in search of health care and hospital excellence’, Advanced Healthcare Management, vol. 17, pp. 223-52, viewed 24 April 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25985514
- Ettorchi-Tardy, A, Levif, M & Michel, P 2012, ‘Benchmarking: A Method for Continuous Quality Improvement in Health’, Healthcare Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, e. 101-119, viewed 24 April 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359088/
- Hospice UK 2017, What is Clinical Benchmarking?, viewed 24 April 2018, https://www.hospiceuk.org/docs/default-source/What-We-Offer/Care-Support-Programmes/benchmarking/what-is-clinical-benchmarking.pdf?sfvrsn=2
- Kay, JFL 2007, ‘Health Care Benchmarking’, The Hong Kong Medical Diary, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 22-7, viewed 24 April 2018, http://www.fmshk.org/database/articles/06mbdrflkay.pdf
- NHS Wales 2018, Benchmarking, viewed 24 April 2018, http://www.wales.nhs.uk/technologymls/english/resources/pdf/tools/Benchmarking%20final.pdf
- Royal College of Nursing 2014, Understanding Benchmarking, viewed 24 April 2018, https://matrix.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/586985/003_144_web.pdf
- Sower, VE 2007, Benchmarking In Hospitals: More Than a Scorecard, Sam Houston State University, viewed 24 April 2018, http://www.shsu.edu/~mgt_ves/BenchmarkingArticle.pdf
- University of Tasmania 2018, Curriculum and Quality Benchmarking, viewed 24 april 2018, http://www.utas.edu.au/curriculum-and-quality/quality/external-referencing/benchmarking
- York , AC 2015, ‘Let’s talk about benchmarking’, Nursing Made Incredible Easy, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 4, viewed 24 April 2018, https://journals.lww.com/nursingmadeincrediblyeasy/Fulltext/2015/03000/Let_s_talk_about_benchmarking.1.aspx
Anne is a freelance lecturer and medical writer at Mind Body Ink. She is a former midwife and nurse teacher with over 25 years’ experience working in the fields of healthcare, stress management and medical hypnosis. Her background includes working as a hospital midwife, Critical Care nurse, lecturer in Neonatal Intensive Care, and as a Clinical Nurse Specialist for a company making life support equipment. Anne has also studied many forms of complementary medicine and has extensive experience in the field of clinical hypnosis. She has a special interest in integrating complementary medicine into conventional healthcare settings and is currently an Associate Tutor, lecturing in Health Coaching and Medical Hypnosis at Exeter University in the UK. As a former Midwife, Anne has a natural passion for writing about fertility, pregnancy, birthing and baby care. Her recent publications include The Health Factor, Coach Yourself To Better Health and Positive Thinking For Kids. You can read more about her work at www.MindBodyInk.com.