Correct Identification and Procedure Matching
Published: 22 May 2018
Published: 22 May 2018
Mistakes can and will happen, which is why correct identification and procedure matching is crucial for minimising risk and keeping our patients safe.
Communicating for Safety is the 6th standard from the recently updated National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards.
It’s about the clinical governance and quality improvement necessary to support effective communication and ensures that ‘systems are in place for effective and coordinated communication that supports the delivery of continuous and safe care for patients.’
Standard 6.5 is specifically focused on correct patient identification with ‘systems to maintain the identity of the patient are used to ensure that the patient receives the care intended for them.’ These include:
When we fail to identify a patient correctly and match them with their intended procedure, the results can be disastrous including the wrong procedure being performed on the wrong person, wrong side or site; medication errors, blood transfusion errors and incorrect diagnostic tests being performed.
It is important to consistently check the patient’s identity and match it with their intended care throughout their hospital stay and ensure this has been correctly documented.
As soon as the patient enters the ward or surgical suite, it is crucial to check that they are the expected person for the planned procedure or care.
Clinical registration or hospital admission policies need to clearly document how to identify the patient using three of the approved identifiers.
How this information is obtained should include:
This is the best way to ensure that the correct patient is in front of you and expecting the same procedure that you have listed.
Mistakes can happen when appointments are made, letters dispatched or transfers between departments. Unless cognitive function is impaired, the patient knows themselves and what they’re expecting best.
Although it is important to bear in mind that some patients’ anxiety will prevent them from processing information correctly, meaning that they may nod and agree with something that’s incorrect, using open-ended questions along with checking the identity band against their notes is the best way to ensure a positive match.
There will be some situations where the patient is unconscious and unable to provide the information required.
In these instances, every effort must be made to identify the correct patient, but identifiers may be limited to medical number and gender without the patient able to confirm their name, address and date of birth.
Therefore, prior documentation of the patient’s identity is important and confirmation that clinical handover at every stage has been handled correctly.
You must ensure that the approved identifiers have been recorded, and how that information has been obtained is documented.
There should be a clear policy and process in place for this at your organisation including where and how to document the information.
Remember that if it hasn’t been written down, you cannot prove you’ve done it so take care with your notes and be sure they’re accurate.
There are six approved identifiers used to ensure the right patient is matched with the right procedure. These include:
Three of these must be used every time a procedure is being discussed with the patient or about to be carried out, to safeguard against medical errors or breach of confidentiality.
Studies in the USA have found that the risk of false matching decreases dramatically from a 2-in-3 chance to a 1-in-3500 chance when the first and last name, postcode and date of birth are used to identify a patient compared to last name alone.
With some names being common, it is not unusual to have two patients in the same ward with the same last name (or both names), in which case it is vital that other identifying information is used before carrying out the procedure.
The patient identity wristband is consistently used to check the approved identifiers throughout their hospital stay and at each stage of treatment.
Whether it uses barcode technology or printed details, it is paramount that all details are correct for the patient so that positive identification can be confirmed.
The Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care developed specifications for a national patient identification band to ensure standardised best-practice across the country.
Based on the principle that the primary purpose of the identification band is to identify the patient; the Commission believes that black text on a single white band with the core patient identifiers is the safest and most reliable way to present the information.
That means coloured wristbands to denote allergies or specific wards are no longer considered appropriate, and that the identity band should only contain the following information:
Family and given names should be clearly differentiated to prevent misidentification, this is done by having the family name appearing first in upper case letters followed by the given names in title case. i.e. DOE Jane.
It is important to remember that the wristband isn’t always right.
Errors can occur when inputting the information into the computer system that aren’t immediately spotted so always ensure that you’re checking the wristband with something else such as the medical notes and your patient, where possible.
Where a clinical handover is needed at the end of a shift or for patient transfer, it is critical that both medical professionals check the identity of the patient using three of the approved identifiers, ideally with the patient involved.
Clinical handover often happens in the staff room or another area of the ward large enough for all team members to gather, but this can lead to confusion where several patients and procedures are discussed at the same time.
Bedside handover using the identity band and patient’s confirmation is the best way of ensuring that patients safety.
According to the Productivity Commission’s report on government health services, there were 82 ‘sentinel incidents’ nationally in 2015-16 of which 5 were where ‘procedures involving the wrong patient or body part resulted in death or major permanent loss of function’ compared to just 1 in 2014-2015.
Patient safety incidents like these and near misses that are associated with incorrect patient identification is a recognised problem internationally and has been identified as a key patient safety goal by agencies around the world.
Medical errors that might occur due to patient misidentification include:
It is important to mention that these mistakes often harm two or more patients, such as two patients with similar names receiving the procedure meant for the other, or the implant reserved for one patient being used on another meaning their procedure is cancelled.
The World Health Organisation introduced the Surgical Safety Checklist in 2008 where identification and safety checks are carried out at pre-anaesthetic induction, before skin incision is made, and before the patient leaves the operating theatre.
A review of the use of the checklist found a reduction in patient mortality and inpatient complications compared to non-use.
Patient identification errors can occur anywhere within the healthcare process and at any healthcare facility which is why the NSQHS standards are important in keeping mistakes to a minimum.
Ensuring you know the policies and processes of your organisation and following them with every patient is the best way to keep your patients safe and receiving the treatment intended for them.
Zoe is a copywriter and blogger from the UK. Once working as an Operating Department Practitioner in a busy Orthopaedic theatre suite specialising in regional anaesthetic techniques, she now writes for the health industry due to disability. Using the education and skills learned as a nurse, along with the experience of being disabled – Zoe is passionate about helping health professionals communicate better with their patients via social media, blogs and websites. In her spare time, Zoe is a governor at her local primary school, and is writing a play about invisible illness. See Educator Profile