facebook-script

How Does the ACQSC Respond To and Manage Non-Compliance?

How Does the ACQSC Respond To and Manage Non-Compliance?

cover image

Subscribe to the L&D Toolbox

This information is accurate under the 1997 Aged Care Act 1997 and the 2019 Aged Care Quality Standards.

With the introduction of the New Aged Care Act 1997, updated regulatory model, audit methodology, and strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards expected in 2025, further changes are anticipated, including adjustments aligned with the Commission's 2024-2025 Regulatory Strategy.

This article will be reviewed and updated as these changes are implemented.

A High Standard of Care

Ensuring the highest standards of care in aged care facilities is a collective responsibility, involving both regulatory bodies and service providers. The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) and providers have distinct yet interlinked roles when it comes to non-compliance with the Aged Care Act and related quality standards.

To learn more about what the Aged Care Commission identifies, assesses, and detertmines compliance - view our article here.

How the Aged Care Commission Deals with Non-Compliance

When addressing non-compliance issues among care providers, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission employs a risk-based approach. This strategy is deeply rooted in the foundational guidelines set forth by the Aged Care Act 1997 1997, the Commission Act, and associated rules. Key considerations include:

  • Consumer Safety and Well-being: The risk posed to the health, safety, and quality of life for consumers is a pivotal focus.
  • Leadership and Governance: The extent to which the provider has implemented effective leadership and governance to mitigate and manage risks to consumers.
  • Track Record: How the provider has historically managed the quality and safety of their care.
  • Self-Monitoring: The effectiveness of a provider's internal mechanisms for monitoring its care delivery.
  • Quality Issues Resolution: The provider's efficiency in identifying and resolving quality-related challenges.

The Commission's actions are proportionate and aligned with the provider’s demonstrated commitment to compliance. For example, providers who show a willingness and capability to comply will face different enforcement actions compared to those who are either indifferent to delivering high-quality care or deliberately non-compliant, thereby putting older people at increased risk

What Actions Does the Aged Care Commission Take When A Provider is Non-Compliant?

Low-Moderate Non-Compliance - Regulatory Actions

When the risk of non-compliance is low to medium, actions may include:

  • Directions: Providers may receive specific guidance to correct non-compliance within set timeframes. Non-adherence can lead to further enforcement.
  • Information Requests: Providers may need to submit documentation such as financial reports or self-assessments to show remedial actions taken.
  • No Immediate Action: If a provider effectively rectifies its non-compliance, the Commission may decide not to take immediate action. However, this will be noted for future risk assessments.

These actions extend to special programmes like the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. Non-compliance in these cases may result in reduced funding from the Department of Health.

Serious Non-Compliance - Enforcable Actions

When risks to consumers are medium to severe, or if a provider fails to attend to non-compliance despite initial regulatory action, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission may escalate to enforceable regulatory actions. These tougher measures signify the Commission's diminished trust in the provider's intent and ability to rectify issues.

Enforceable actions are determined case-by-case, factoring in:

  • The severity of the non-compliance
  • The potential for further harm to consumers
  • The likelihood of the provider implementing corrective measures

The objective is to compel providers to address quality and safety risks swiftly. It also serves as a deterrent against future non-compliance. In extreme cases, the Commission may even remove the provider from the sector entirely.

When faced with provider non-compliance, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission has a toolkit of actions to enforce rules and standards. These actions range from compulsory information gathering to potential sanctions. Here is each action defined.

Compulsory Information Gathering Powers

The Commission may issue a written notice demanding specific information or documents within a reasonable timeframe. Failure to comply can lead to legal penalties.

Compliance Notices

These are categorised into Incident Management Compliance Notices (IMCN) and Restrictive Practices Compliance Notices (RPCN). Such notices mandate providers to correct non-compliance within a defined period. Failure can result in civil penalties or sanctions.

Variation to Reduce Period of Residential Service Accreditation

If an accredited residential aged care service fails to meet Quality Standards, the Commission can reduce its accreditation period.

Non-Compliance Notice

This notice is issued when a provider is non-compliant but poses no immediate and severe risk to consumer safety. It outlines required remedial actions and could lead to sanctions.

Notice to Remedy Action

Upon satisfactory provider response to a Non-Compliance Notice, a Notice to Remedy may be issued. It mandates a provider to submit an 'Undertaking to Remedy' within 14 days. Non-compliance could lead to further sanctions.

Notice to Agree with Action

Where high-to-severe risks are present, the Commission may issue a Notice to Agree outlining specific actions that the provider must follow. Failure to comply can result in the revocation of the approval to provide aged care.

Infringement Notice

Isolated or non-systemic contraventions may attract infringement notices, requiring the provider to either pay a specified amount or challenge the notice in court.

Enforceable Undertaking

An enforceable undertaking is a mutual agreement between the Commission and a provider, detailing steps to rectify non-compliance.

Injunctions

TThe Commission may apply for a court injunction when a provider contravenes the Aged Care Act 1997. Injunctions can either restrict certain actions or compel providers to act, especially when there’s an immediate risk to consumers.

Civil Penalties

These are monetary fines levied against providers who fail to meet certain criteria within the Commission Act or Aged Care Act. It’s a court-supervised process, generally enacted when consumers are at risk due to poor incident management or anti-victimisation measures.

Sanctions

Sanctions are levied when a provider is found non-compliant with its responsibilities. The Commission considers factors like the severity and frequency of non-compliance, the health risks involved, and the provider's response to previous regulatory notices.

Enforceable Actions Summarised

Below is a summary of all the enforceable actions the Aged Care Commission can take:

Action Type Trigger Action Potential Consequence Other Considerations
Compulsory Information Gathering Required for Commission's functions Legal Penalties -
Compliance Notices IMCN/RPCN Non-compliance with specific Aged Care Act responsibilities Civil penalties or sanctions Designed for immediate response
Variation to Accreditation Low confidence in provider's commitment to Quality Standards Reduced accreditation period -
Non-Compliance Notice Non-compliance not posing immediate/severe risk Sanctions Provider can make submissions before sanctions
Notice to Remedy Satisfactory response to Non-Compliance Notice Further sanctions if not complied with 14-day timeframe
Notice to Agree High to severe risk to consumer safety Revocation of approval to provide aged care Immediate action needed
Infringement Notice Isolated, non-systemic contraventions Pay the amount or challenge in court No immediate/significant risk to consumers
Enforceable Undertaking Mutual agreement Court enforcement if breached No immediate/significant risk to consumers
Injunction
  • Immediate risk to consumers
  • Failure to respond to regulatory actions
Restrictive or compulsory court orders Court supervision for compliance
Civil Penalties
  • Inadequate incident management
  • Failure to respond to previous regulations
Monetary fines up to a specified maximum Not a criminal conviction
Sanctions
  • Non-compliance with aged care responsibilities
  • Immediate and severe risk to consumer well-being
Varies from funding restrictions to revoking approvals
  • Severity and frequency of non-compliance
  • Provider's response to regulatory actions

Revocation Actions the Commission Can Take

With aged care providers under scrutiny for compliance with Quality Standards, it's vital to understand the most severe regulatory actions the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission can take: revocation of accreditation, revocation sanctions, and reconsideration of suitability to provide care.

This article explains these last-resort measures used in Australia when a provider demonstrates serious non-compliance or becomes unsuitable to deliver care.

Revocation of Residential Service Accreditation

PProviders can lose their accreditation if they are significantly non-compliant or lack commitment to continuous improvement. They may apply for re-accreditation but must pass a site audit to demonstrate compliance with Quality Standards.

Revocation Sanction Imposed

In extreme cases of non-compliance, like systematic or criminal actions, the Commission can fast-track a provider's exit from the sector through revocation sanctions.

Reconsideration of Suitability

The Commission can re-evaluate a provider’s suitability to deliver aged care, which could result in the cessation of Commonwealth subsidies.

Revocation Actions Summarised

Revocation Action Triggering Factors Consequences Other Considerations
Revocation of Residential Service Accreditation
  • Significant non-compliance
  • Lack of commitment to improvement
Cessation of accreditation, possibility for re-accreditation Requirement of a site audit for re-accreditation
Revocation Sanction
  • Systematic, repeated, wilful, or criminal non-compliance
Expedited exit from the sector Immediate and severe consequences
Reconsideration of Suitability
  • Serious non-compliance
  • Unsuitability to provide care
Cessation of Commonwealth subsidies
  • Provider is notified and can make a submission
  • Timeframe for potential revocation

What is a Penalty Unit?

A penalty unit is a standardised amount used to calculate fines. For example, as of April 2021, one penalty unit is $222. Penalties for body corporates can range up to five times the base penalty units.

These measures, combined with previous enforcement actions, work cohesively to maintain high standards of care while ensuring that providers remain aligned with the Aged Care Act.

Penalty Units - Infringement Notice Penalties

The following are the related maximum penalty units and costs associated with infringement notices:

Provision Maximum penalty units Maximum penalty costs
Failing to comply with a written notice to produce information or documents
Offence under s74GA Commission Act
30 Units $6660
Failing to comply with requests for information regarding provider suitability and financial matters, including in relation to refundable accommodation deposits and accommodation bonds
Offences under sections 9-2, 9-3A and 9-3B of the Aged Care Act
30 Units $6660

Penalty Unit - Civil Penalties

The following are the related maximum penalty units and costs associated with civil penalties:

Civil penalty provision Maximum penalty units Maximum penalty costs
Victimising/causing detriment to a person who has disclosed that they suspect a reportable incident has occurred (discloser)
s54-6(1) Aged Care Act
500 Units $111,000
Threatening to cause detriment to a discloser where it is intended to cause fear (or being reckless as to the fear caused)
S54-6(2) Aged Care Act
500 Units $111,000
Failure to comply with an Incident Management Compliance Notice
S74EE(3) Commission Act
60 Units $13,320
Failure to comply with a Restrictive Practices Compliance Notice
S74EE(3) Commission Act
60 Units $13,320

The Commission employs these actions as final steps, indicating a complete lack of trust in the provider's ability to provide quality care. Providers must adhere to all regulatory requirements to avoid these severe consequences.

Commission's Response to Non-Compliance

The Commission will develop a response plan, specifying activities to ensure that providers meet their responsibilities. The nature and frequency of monitoring depend on the non-compliance level, risk to consumers, and the provider's willingness to act.

Provider's Role in Addressing Non-Compliance

Providers are expected to take prompt action in several key areas, such as managing risks, communicating findings with consumers, and meeting regulatory requirements within specific timeframes.

Appointment of an Adviser

In some cases, providers may be required to appoint an adviser to enhance consumer safety and support compliance. This is usually at the provider's own expense and the adviser must have appropriate qualifications.

Summary of Actions the ACQSC Can Take in Managing Non-Compliance

Aspect Responsibilities Methodology Other Considerations
Commission Monitoring
  • Develop a response plan
  • Monitor provider activities
Based on level of non-compliance and risk -
Provider Action
  • Manage risks to consumers
  • Communicate findings
  • Revise improvement plans
Within specified timeframes -
Appointment of Adviser
  • Appoint a qualified adviser
Upon receiving a Notice to Agree or through an enforceable undertaking At the provider's own expense

Summary

In summary, the Commission takes a comprehensive, risk-based approach to addressing non-compliance using a variety of regulatory tools. As the Aged Care sector transitions into the new regulatory environment anticipated in 2025, providers must stay ahead by adopting a robust internal framework that includes regular training, transparent reporting, and proactive risk assessments. Adhering to these best practices not only ensures compliance with current standards but also prepares providers for the forthcoming changes under the New Aged Care Act and regulatory model.

By doing so, providers can align with the evolving Commission’s regulatory requirements, safeguard older people’s health and wellbeing, and foster a culture of quality and safety within Australia's aged care sector.

Need a system to support meeting compliance requirements in aged care?

Contact Ausmed today and see how we can support your aged care organisation today!

Additional resources

References

Author

Zoe Youl - Head of Community at Ausmed

Zoe Youl 

Zoe Youl is a Critical Care Registered Nurse with over ten years of experience at Ausmed, currently as Head of Community. With expertise in critical care nursing, clinical governance, education and nursing professional development, she has built an in-depth understanding of the educational and regulatory needs of the Australian healthcare sector.

As the Accredited Provider Program Director (AP-PD) of the Ausmed Education Learning Centre, she maintains and applies accreditation frameworks in software and education. In 2024, Zoe lead the Ausmed Education Learning Centre to achieve Accreditation with Distinction for the fourth consecutive cycle with the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s (ANCC) Commission on Accreditation. The AELC is the only Australian provider of nursing continuing professional development to receive this prestigious recognition.

Zoe holds a Master's in Nursing Management and Leadership, and her professional interests focus on evaluating the translation of continuing professional development into practice to improve learner and healthcare consumer outcomes. From 2019-2022, Zoe provided an international perspective to the workgroup established to publish the fourth edition of Nursing Professional Development Scope & Standards of Practice. Zoe was invited to be a peer reviewer for the 6th edition of the Core Curriculum for Nursing Professional Development.

How Does the ACQSC Respond To and Manage Non-Compliance?

How Does the ACQSC Respond To and Manage Non-Compliance?

cover image

Subscribe to the L&D Toolbox

This information is accurate under the 1997 Aged Care Act 1997 and the 2019 Aged Care Quality Standards.

With the introduction of the New Aged Care Act 1997, updated regulatory model, audit methodology, and strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards expected in 2025, further changes are anticipated, including adjustments aligned with the Commission's 2024-2025 Regulatory Strategy.

This article will be reviewed and updated as these changes are implemented.

A High Standard of Care

Ensuring the highest standards of care in aged care facilities is a collective responsibility, involving both regulatory bodies and service providers. The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) and providers have distinct yet interlinked roles when it comes to non-compliance with the Aged Care Act and related quality standards.

To learn more about what the Aged Care Commission identifies, assesses, and detertmines compliance - view our article here.

How the Aged Care Commission Deals with Non-Compliance

When addressing non-compliance issues among care providers, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission employs a risk-based approach. This strategy is deeply rooted in the foundational guidelines set forth by the Aged Care Act 1997 1997, the Commission Act, and associated rules. Key considerations include:

  • Consumer Safety and Well-being: The risk posed to the health, safety, and quality of life for consumers is a pivotal focus.
  • Leadership and Governance: The extent to which the provider has implemented effective leadership and governance to mitigate and manage risks to consumers.
  • Track Record: How the provider has historically managed the quality and safety of their care.
  • Self-Monitoring: The effectiveness of a provider's internal mechanisms for monitoring its care delivery.
  • Quality Issues Resolution: The provider's efficiency in identifying and resolving quality-related challenges.

The Commission's actions are proportionate and aligned with the provider’s demonstrated commitment to compliance. For example, providers who show a willingness and capability to comply will face different enforcement actions compared to those who are either indifferent to delivering high-quality care or deliberately non-compliant, thereby putting older people at increased risk

What Actions Does the Aged Care Commission Take When A Provider is Non-Compliant?

Low-Moderate Non-Compliance - Regulatory Actions

When the risk of non-compliance is low to medium, actions may include:

  • Directions: Providers may receive specific guidance to correct non-compliance within set timeframes. Non-adherence can lead to further enforcement.
  • Information Requests: Providers may need to submit documentation such as financial reports or self-assessments to show remedial actions taken.
  • No Immediate Action: If a provider effectively rectifies its non-compliance, the Commission may decide not to take immediate action. However, this will be noted for future risk assessments.

These actions extend to special programmes like the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. Non-compliance in these cases may result in reduced funding from the Department of Health.

Serious Non-Compliance - Enforcable Actions

When risks to consumers are medium to severe, or if a provider fails to attend to non-compliance despite initial regulatory action, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission may escalate to enforceable regulatory actions. These tougher measures signify the Commission's diminished trust in the provider's intent and ability to rectify issues.

Enforceable actions are determined case-by-case, factoring in:

  • The severity of the non-compliance
  • The potential for further harm to consumers
  • The likelihood of the provider implementing corrective measures

The objective is to compel providers to address quality and safety risks swiftly. It also serves as a deterrent against future non-compliance. In extreme cases, the Commission may even remove the provider from the sector entirely.

When faced with provider non-compliance, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission has a toolkit of actions to enforce rules and standards. These actions range from compulsory information gathering to potential sanctions. Here is each action defined.

Compulsory Information Gathering Powers

The Commission may issue a written notice demanding specific information or documents within a reasonable timeframe. Failure to comply can lead to legal penalties.

Compliance Notices

These are categorised into Incident Management Compliance Notices (IMCN) and Restrictive Practices Compliance Notices (RPCN). Such notices mandate providers to correct non-compliance within a defined period. Failure can result in civil penalties or sanctions.

Variation to Reduce Period of Residential Service Accreditation

If an accredited residential aged care service fails to meet Quality Standards, the Commission can reduce its accreditation period.

Non-Compliance Notice

This notice is issued when a provider is non-compliant but poses no immediate and severe risk to consumer safety. It outlines required remedial actions and could lead to sanctions.

Notice to Remedy Action

Upon satisfactory provider response to a Non-Compliance Notice, a Notice to Remedy may be issued. It mandates a provider to submit an 'Undertaking to Remedy' within 14 days. Non-compliance could lead to further sanctions.

Notice to Agree with Action

Where high-to-severe risks are present, the Commission may issue a Notice to Agree outlining specific actions that the provider must follow. Failure to comply can result in the revocation of the approval to provide aged care.

Infringement Notice

Isolated or non-systemic contraventions may attract infringement notices, requiring the provider to either pay a specified amount or challenge the notice in court.

Enforceable Undertaking

An enforceable undertaking is a mutual agreement between the Commission and a provider, detailing steps to rectify non-compliance.

Injunctions

TThe Commission may apply for a court injunction when a provider contravenes the Aged Care Act 1997. Injunctions can either restrict certain actions or compel providers to act, especially when there’s an immediate risk to consumers.

Civil Penalties

These are monetary fines levied against providers who fail to meet certain criteria within the Commission Act or Aged Care Act. It’s a court-supervised process, generally enacted when consumers are at risk due to poor incident management or anti-victimisation measures.

Sanctions

Sanctions are levied when a provider is found non-compliant with its responsibilities. The Commission considers factors like the severity and frequency of non-compliance, the health risks involved, and the provider's response to previous regulatory notices.

Enforceable Actions Summarised

Below is a summary of all the enforceable actions the Aged Care Commission can take:

Action Type Trigger Action Potential Consequence Other Considerations
Compulsory Information Gathering Required for Commission's functions Legal Penalties -
Compliance Notices IMCN/RPCN Non-compliance with specific Aged Care Act responsibilities Civil penalties or sanctions Designed for immediate response
Variation to Accreditation Low confidence in provider's commitment to Quality Standards Reduced accreditation period -
Non-Compliance Notice Non-compliance not posing immediate/severe risk Sanctions Provider can make submissions before sanctions
Notice to Remedy Satisfactory response to Non-Compliance Notice Further sanctions if not complied with 14-day timeframe
Notice to Agree High to severe risk to consumer safety Revocation of approval to provide aged care Immediate action needed
Infringement Notice Isolated, non-systemic contraventions Pay the amount or challenge in court No immediate/significant risk to consumers
Enforceable Undertaking Mutual agreement Court enforcement if breached No immediate/significant risk to consumers
Injunction
  • Immediate risk to consumers
  • Failure to respond to regulatory actions
Restrictive or compulsory court orders Court supervision for compliance
Civil Penalties
  • Inadequate incident management
  • Failure to respond to previous regulations
Monetary fines up to a specified maximum Not a criminal conviction
Sanctions
  • Non-compliance with aged care responsibilities
  • Immediate and severe risk to consumer well-being
Varies from funding restrictions to revoking approvals
  • Severity and frequency of non-compliance
  • Provider's response to regulatory actions

Revocation Actions the Commission Can Take

With aged care providers under scrutiny for compliance with Quality Standards, it's vital to understand the most severe regulatory actions the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission can take: revocation of accreditation, revocation sanctions, and reconsideration of suitability to provide care.

This article explains these last-resort measures used in Australia when a provider demonstrates serious non-compliance or becomes unsuitable to deliver care.

Revocation of Residential Service Accreditation

PProviders can lose their accreditation if they are significantly non-compliant or lack commitment to continuous improvement. They may apply for re-accreditation but must pass a site audit to demonstrate compliance with Quality Standards.

Revocation Sanction Imposed

In extreme cases of non-compliance, like systematic or criminal actions, the Commission can fast-track a provider's exit from the sector through revocation sanctions.

Reconsideration of Suitability

The Commission can re-evaluate a provider’s suitability to deliver aged care, which could result in the cessation of Commonwealth subsidies.

Revocation Actions Summarised

Revocation Action Triggering Factors Consequences Other Considerations
Revocation of Residential Service Accreditation
  • Significant non-compliance
  • Lack of commitment to improvement
Cessation of accreditation, possibility for re-accreditation Requirement of a site audit for re-accreditation
Revocation Sanction
  • Systematic, repeated, wilful, or criminal non-compliance
Expedited exit from the sector Immediate and severe consequences
Reconsideration of Suitability
  • Serious non-compliance
  • Unsuitability to provide care
Cessation of Commonwealth subsidies
  • Provider is notified and can make a submission
  • Timeframe for potential revocation

What is a Penalty Unit?

A penalty unit is a standardised amount used to calculate fines. For example, as of April 2021, one penalty unit is $222. Penalties for body corporates can range up to five times the base penalty units.

These measures, combined with previous enforcement actions, work cohesively to maintain high standards of care while ensuring that providers remain aligned with the Aged Care Act.

Penalty Units - Infringement Notice Penalties

The following are the related maximum penalty units and costs associated with infringement notices:

Provision Maximum penalty units Maximum penalty costs
Failing to comply with a written notice to produce information or documents
Offence under s74GA Commission Act
30 Units $6660
Failing to comply with requests for information regarding provider suitability and financial matters, including in relation to refundable accommodation deposits and accommodation bonds
Offences under sections 9-2, 9-3A and 9-3B of the Aged Care Act
30 Units $6660

Penalty Unit - Civil Penalties

The following are the related maximum penalty units and costs associated with civil penalties:

Civil penalty provision Maximum penalty units Maximum penalty costs
Victimising/causing detriment to a person who has disclosed that they suspect a reportable incident has occurred (discloser)
s54-6(1) Aged Care Act
500 Units $111,000
Threatening to cause detriment to a discloser where it is intended to cause fear (or being reckless as to the fear caused)
S54-6(2) Aged Care Act
500 Units $111,000
Failure to comply with an Incident Management Compliance Notice
S74EE(3) Commission Act
60 Units $13,320
Failure to comply with a Restrictive Practices Compliance Notice
S74EE(3) Commission Act
60 Units $13,320

The Commission employs these actions as final steps, indicating a complete lack of trust in the provider's ability to provide quality care. Providers must adhere to all regulatory requirements to avoid these severe consequences.

Commission's Response to Non-Compliance

The Commission will develop a response plan, specifying activities to ensure that providers meet their responsibilities. The nature and frequency of monitoring depend on the non-compliance level, risk to consumers, and the provider's willingness to act.

Provider's Role in Addressing Non-Compliance

Providers are expected to take prompt action in several key areas, such as managing risks, communicating findings with consumers, and meeting regulatory requirements within specific timeframes.

Appointment of an Adviser

In some cases, providers may be required to appoint an adviser to enhance consumer safety and support compliance. This is usually at the provider's own expense and the adviser must have appropriate qualifications.

Summary of Actions the ACQSC Can Take in Managing Non-Compliance

Aspect Responsibilities Methodology Other Considerations
Commission Monitoring
  • Develop a response plan
  • Monitor provider activities
Based on level of non-compliance and risk -
Provider Action
  • Manage risks to consumers
  • Communicate findings
  • Revise improvement plans
Within specified timeframes -
Appointment of Adviser
  • Appoint a qualified adviser
Upon receiving a Notice to Agree or through an enforceable undertaking At the provider's own expense

Summary

In summary, the Commission takes a comprehensive, risk-based approach to addressing non-compliance using a variety of regulatory tools. As the Aged Care sector transitions into the new regulatory environment anticipated in 2025, providers must stay ahead by adopting a robust internal framework that includes regular training, transparent reporting, and proactive risk assessments. Adhering to these best practices not only ensures compliance with current standards but also prepares providers for the forthcoming changes under the New Aged Care Act and regulatory model.

By doing so, providers can align with the evolving Commission’s regulatory requirements, safeguard older people’s health and wellbeing, and foster a culture of quality and safety within Australia's aged care sector.

Need a system to support meeting compliance requirements in aged care?

Contact Ausmed today and see how we can support your aged care organisation today!

Additional resources

References

Author

Zoe Youl - Head of Community at Ausmed

Zoe Youl 

Zoe Youl is a Critical Care Registered Nurse with over ten years of experience at Ausmed, currently as Head of Community. With expertise in critical care nursing, clinical governance, education and nursing professional development, she has built an in-depth understanding of the educational and regulatory needs of the Australian healthcare sector.

As the Accredited Provider Program Director (AP-PD) of the Ausmed Education Learning Centre, she maintains and applies accreditation frameworks in software and education. In 2024, Zoe lead the Ausmed Education Learning Centre to achieve Accreditation with Distinction for the fourth consecutive cycle with the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s (ANCC) Commission on Accreditation. The AELC is the only Australian provider of nursing continuing professional development to receive this prestigious recognition.

Zoe holds a Master's in Nursing Management and Leadership, and her professional interests focus on evaluating the translation of continuing professional development into practice to improve learner and healthcare consumer outcomes. From 2019-2022, Zoe provided an international perspective to the workgroup established to publish the fourth edition of Nursing Professional Development Scope & Standards of Practice. Zoe was invited to be a peer reviewer for the 6th edition of the Core Curriculum for Nursing Professional Development.