The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich
Published: 13 September 2018
Published: 13 September 2018
Everybody seems to have known a nurse, to have one in their family, or at least to have received nursing care at some stage in their life. Nurses are seen to be compassionate, caring and ethical. If a nurse goes off track and does something that causes harm to others, it makes the headlines.
People find it hard to conceptualise the idea that a nurse, whose raison d’être is to help and protect people, would intentionally hurt someone. Nurses who kill are seen as deviant and wicked, and should be locked away for life.
Of course, this is probably right, in the most simplistic sense. But, what if a nurse thought that killing patients was the right thing to do? That killing them was part of their job description, and that they were really doing the patient a favour by putting them out of their misery?
Few nurses today would subscribe to such theories (although some do – to be discussed in a later article). In one part of history, however, this subversion of nursing ethics not only existed but was state-sanctioned.
In 1933, Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. The philosophies of the Nazi party, of which he was head, were based on eugenics – a pseudoscience that had much traction around the world at the time.
Eugenics dictated that only the healthiest and fittest be allowed to procreate and to live. The Nazis’ racial policies, which divided human races into levels of fitness for life, synergised with eugenics to support programmes declaring certain people ‘life unworthy of life‘ or ‘useless feeders.’
Under such policies, people with mental illnesses, physical and intellectual disabilities, and conditions such as epilepsy, chronic alcoholism and a range of genetic diseases, were considered a burden on society and should be annihilated.
To this end, in 1939, Hitler, through his personal physician Dr Karl Brandt, set up the ‘T4′ programme – the systematic, state-sanctioned murder of the disabled and chronically ill. The first people to be killed were disabled children.
The main killing centres were hospitals and homes for the disabled. Parents and carers were encouraged to place their loved ones and children into institutions. They would then be moved to another institution a long way from home, and contact between child and parent ceased.
After some months, parents received a letter saying that their child had died of something like pneumonia or appendicitis and that the parents could come and collect their ashes and pay for the funeral.
Doctors would assess the patients and make a mark on a standard questionnaire that dictated whether the person was to be killed or allowed to live.
While doctors made the decisions about who should live or die, the nurses did the killing. The killings took place in hospitals. Who constitutes the largest proportion of the workforce in a hospital? It’s the nurses, and it was the nurses who killed.
They used intravenous injections, lethal doses of drugs such as phenobarbitone, or starvation or hypothermia from exposure.
In Hitler’s Germany, propaganda underpinned everything.
Propaganda about ‘life unworthy of life’ and ‘useless feeders’ was everywhere, even in arithmetic exercises for primary school children.
Many people genuinely believed that by removing these burdens on society, Germany would be a better place. Nurses, too, succumbed to the propaganda. Many believed that they were doing the right thing, that Germany would be a better place because of these policies.
Of course, there were many who disagreed and would not take part. These nurses were not punished, nor ostracised – they were moved to another hospital or another ward.
In other words, the nurses who participated in this murder did so willingly and voluntarily.
You can read more about the ethics of nursing and midwifery. and how these were abrogated during the Nazi Germany era in Linda Shields’ book, Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany: The Euthanasia Programs (Routledge Studies in Modern European History).