The Small for Gestational Age Baby
Published: 25 November 2021
Published: 25 November 2021
When an infant has an estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference that is below the 10th centile, they are referred to as being small for gestational age (SGA) (University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust 2021).
These babies fall into one of two broad categories:
(Osuchukwu and Reed 2021)
For those infants who are healthy and constitutionally normal, their low birth weight may simply be the result of factors such as maternal height, weight, ethnicity and parity. In these cases, there is no increased risk of perinatal mortality or morbidity.
However, the outlook is more concerning for babies whose reduced birth weight is caused by fetal growth restriction (FGR). With an overall incidence of about 11% in Australia, the causes of FGR are diverse and may include both fetal and maternal factors, or be linked to demographic influences (Osuchukwu and Reed 2021).
In 2017, Kildea et al. specifically looked at the rates of SGA babies amongst Aboriginal women from remote communities in Northern Australia and discovered that the SGA rate was about 16.3%, suggesting that these women may need a combination of targeted antenatal education along with better access to antenatal care.
Many SGA babies are first identified upon routine palpation during second and third-trimester antenatal visits when the fundal height appears at least 3 cm lower than expected for the stage of gestation (Osuchukwu and Reed 2021).
Confirmation is then made via ultrasound scan, which can detect a pattern of restricted growth over three or four measurements. Criteria for diagnosis include:
(University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust 2021)
The term intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is sometimes mistakenly used interchangeably with SGA. However, IUGR is caused by placental insufficiency, which can compromise the growth rate of the fetus, whereas the cause of SGA is more likely to be multifactorial (Cuttler, Misra & Koontz 2016).
Of the many studies that have explored the causes of SGA, most identify obesity and smoking during pregnancy as likely causes of restricted growth.
Knight-Agarwal et al. (2020) explored the relative risk reduction of SGA in women who stopped smoking, compared to those who continued smoking throughout their pregnancy.
The results were clear: smoking during pregnancy can inhibit fetal growth. Given the clarity of these results, Knight-Agarwal et al. suggest that antenatal smoking cessation sessions could be a highly effective strategy to reduce preventable infant morbidity and mortality.
The following conditions that can be identified at booking are also considered risk factors for SGA:
(University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust 2021)
Osuchukwu and Reed (2021) emphasise the importance of an early review of any chronic maternal conditions such as hypertension, renal disease or diabetes mellitus. They also flag up the importance of identifying any prior history of SGA within the mother’s obstetric or family history. Finally, they also acknowledge the role social stressors can also play in sub-optimal fetal growth.
Given that women of low socioeconomic status are known to be more susceptible to poor infant birth outcomes, McRae et al. (2018) explored the possibility that enhanced antenatal care could minimise the risk of adverse outcomes for this population of mothers. Not surprisingly, they found that outcomes improved with increased availability and accessibility to the maternity team, but they also flagged the need for further research to determine which aspects of care were specifically of greatest value. For example, it’s still unclear whether psychological or physical care has the greater impact on positive outcomes.
Joseph et al. (2020) raise an interesting issue by suggesting that new birthweight charts are needed, based on data for spontaneous singleton births in Australia. If these changes are implemented, it’s likely that some fetuses previously regarded as normal would be identified as small for gestational age. Although it would increase the burden of health care services if more cases of SGA were diagnosed, it may also have the benefit of reducing the incidence of poor clinical outcomes for neonates in the long term.
Newborn babies who are small for their gestational age have a characteristic appearance that typically includes:
(Osuchukwu & Reed 2021)
As Li et al. (2015) say, birthweight remains one of the strongest predictors of perinatal mortality and disability and it’s important to continue to monitor the SGA baby throughout infancy to ensure catch-up growth is achieved.
Most SGA babies achieve catch-up growth by two years of age. This is typically achieved within the first six to nine months of life for approximately 80% of infants born with SGA. Of the remainder, 10 to 15% show slow, attenuated growth, with the remaining 5% to 10% exhibiting a slower catch-up growth pattern between three and five years of age (Cooke, Divall & Radovick 2016).
However, as Osuchukwu and Reed (2021) point out, babies with fetal growth restriction who are small for their gestational age are also at increased risk of other complications such as prematurity, neonatal asphyxia, hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, hypocalcaemia, polycythemia and sepsis. With risks such as these threatening the well-being of both the mother and her baby, it makes sense to invest in the time and resources to ensure mothers enter pregnancy in as healthy a state as possible.